Quantcast
Channel: Updates to Education in New Zealand
Viewing all 1440 articles
Browse latest View live

Here comes iEd – joining up student data and information to help drive better achievement

$
0
0

iEd (Integrated Education Data) is all about using data and information to raise student achievement and wellbeing. It will be rolled out for at least the next 5 years and uses data and information so that resources go to where they’re needed most in the education system.

A vital part of the iEd programme is ensuring that data and information about students is managed and used in a safe and transparent way. Any sharing and reporting of this information will be done carefully with only those with a recognised need being given access to the data.

iEd will also support Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako to set achievement challenges, evaluate progress and share information to improve student performance.

The first part of iEd is an initiative called SISI (Student Information Sharing Initiative) which has been put together by the education sector and the Ministry. When SISI is implemented, all educators will have accurate and reliable information so they can better support student learning and wellbeing.

Critical information about each student will arrive at their school with them on day one. This reduces the burden on teachers to re-test to see where their students are at and means they don’t need to go to previous schools for student information. SISI will start with schools and then expanded so that information is shared between early learning services, schools and tertiary institutions.

As iEd develops the Ministry will continue to work with schools as well as a range of other important stakeholders, to ensure information is useful, relevant and can be safely shared. To learn more about iEd and SISI and get involved, email us on iEd.programme@education.govt.nz


He Pānui Kōhungahunga – the Early Learning Bulletin

$
0
0

We want to hear from you too. If you have any comments or want to share community stories and successes, please email us: ece.info@education.govt.nz .

Calendar of key ECE Ministry dates

Please be aware that the key ECE Ministry dates calendar that can be downloaded into Microsoft Outlook, Google calendar or Apple iCal is currently unavailable. We are working on a solution and will advise services when it is available again.

Key ECE funding dates

For key ECE Funding Dates please refer to the ECE Funding Key Dates for 2017 page .

Asbestos management

$
0
0

On this page:

  • Overview
  • The school's health and safety responsibilities
  • Risk assessment
  • Asbestos management process
  • Further information

Overview

Where asbestos is left in place and is in good condition, it does not pose a significant health and safety risk. However if it is disturbed during refurbishment or demolition, there is a risk of asbestos fibres becoming airborne and creating a health risk.

Asbestos fibres pose a risk to health when they are breathed in and can cause lung disease including cancer. Asbestos risk needs to be managed in a consistent way during all property projects within schools.

The presence of asbestos is not itself a risk. Asbestos and ACMs become a health risk when they are disturbed and fibres are released. It could take many years for the signs of asbestos exposure to show as a health problem. The long period between exposure and sickness means that the risk of asbestos can be overlooked by those undertaking work within the built environment.

The school's health and safety responsibilities

Boards of trustees are responsible for managing any asbestos assumed or identified in their schools, like any other hazards or risks.

Before any construction, demolition, or refurbishment works, the work area needs to be assessed for the presence of asbestos and ACMs. If found, it must be appropriately managed.

Managing asbestos at your school is part of your overall health and safety responsibilities.

To help you meet the requirements of the  Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 , review your school’s health and safety systems against the 11 key components of an effective health and safety system:

For Ministry-run projects, the Education Infrastucture Service will work with the school to identify and manage the presence of asbestos before and during the project.

Risk assessment

The Health and Safety at Work (Asbestos) Regulations prescribe a number of duties for the management of asbestos.

An underlying requirement (Regulation 9) is that the PCBU with management or control of the workplace must ensure that:

  • exposure of a person to airborne asbestos is eliminated so far as is reasonably practicable; and 
  • if it is not reasonably practicable to eliminate exposure, to minimise that exposure.

When managing projects where asbestos is present, or might be present, it is important that the risks be assessed as this will help determine the best control methods to ensure health and safety.

Download checklist for risk assessment

This checklist outlines the actions you need to take to meet the requirements of Regulation 9:

Asbestos management process

The Ministry's Asbestos Management Process outlines the steps that must be taken to check for and manage the presence of asbestos during Ministry-run property projects within schools.

Asbestos management steps summarised

The following steps summarise the process for managing asbestos projects.

1. Check for asbestos before starting a project

Before starting any project, check your buildings for the presence of Asbestos or ACM.

WorkSafe New Zealand has provided some diagrams showing areas where materials containing asbestos are commonly used during construction.

See Where asbestos can be found (Work Safe website)

2. Review the school risk register

Obtain a copy of the school risk register and review it. If the school doesn’t have a risk register, ensure one is put in place immediately.

The risk register should include whether any asbestos or ACM has been identified and if so, the location, condition and quantity of the asbestos.

See Tool 14 on:  Risk identification, assessment and management

3. Consider the type of work involved

If the work involves partial/complete refurbishment, or demolition of a building, plant or infrastructure, it will be intrusive in nature. You cannot start any demolition or refurbishment work until the structure has been inspected to determine whether asbestos or ACM is fixed to or installed in the structure or plan. If material cannot be identified but it is reasonably believed that it is asbestos or ACM, you must assume it to be asbestos.

4. Confirm if asbestos is present

If the work involves demolition or refurbishment, inspect the building or structure to confirm whether asbestos is present.

The person doing the inspection must use appropriate Respiratory Protective Equipment (RPE) as a minimum.

Consider how to provide and manage access to subfloor and ceiling spaces, particularly for buildings which are still in use.

5. Asbestos survey

If asbestos is assumed (or if work involves partial/complete refurbishment or demolition) an asbestos survey for the area of work must be arranged before work starts.

The person procured to conduct the asbestos survey must be suitably qualified/certified to undertake asbestos sampling, testing and/or a survey report based on the work involved.

The surveyor should be briefed with a complete overview of the scope of work to be undertaken as part of the main project. Testing must be analysed by an accredited laboratory.

6. Isolate the hazard

If asbestos is present (and it is confirmed that the condition of the material will either pose a risk to health in its current form or if it is disturbed as a result of work about to commence), the work area should be isolated immediately and appropriate warning signage displayed.

7. Prepare an Asbestos Management Plan

The Health and Safety at Work (Asbestos) Regulations 2016 impose a duty on the ‘person conducting a business or undertaking’ (PCBU) to prepare an asbestos management plan if asbestos or ACM is present. In this case the board would be the PCBU. With your project manager, prepare an Asbestos Management Plan which include the following:

  • identification and location of any asbestos or ACM
  • decisions, and reasons for decisions, about managing the risk arising from asbestos
  • procedures for detailing incidents or emergencies involving asbestos
  • detail about the workers who carry out work involving asbestos including information and training, roles and responsibilities and any health monitoring of the workers that has or will be undertaken.

In the case of ministry lead projects, EIS or their designated project manager is responsible for preparing an Asbestos Management Plan.

8. Carry out the removal works

When you commission the asbestos removal, as a PCBU, you must ensure that the asbestos removal work is carried out by a licensed asbestos remover. The licensed asbestos remover you commission must prepare an ‘asbestos removal control plan’.

For all ministry-led projects, Asbestos Removal Control Plans must be provided to the EIS Health and Safety team for review prior to works commencing.

The Ministry follows good practice for all removals and enforces air monitoring for all Ministry-Led projects, no matter the size or class of removal. Boards are encouraged to follow Ministry processes in relation to air monitoring.

9. Monitor the works

Even if a building or other infrastructure is not assumed to contain asbestos or a survey has concluded that there is no asbestos present, as PCBU, you must nevertheless have an Asbestos Management Plan in place to monitor the works for potential asbestos.

10. Get clearances and update the Risk Register

When the work is finished, as PCBU, you must ensure necessary clearances are obtained before anyone not directly involved in the asbestos work can re-occupy the area. You must also update the school’s asbestos information (both school and Ministry records), the hazard register for the site and the more general risk register for the school.

11. Paying for asbestos management

The cost of managing the asbestos safely is part of the project costs.

If this causes a major overrun in a project budget, help may be available.

See:  Budget Plus and Unforeseen Work funding for school property work

Download full Asbestos Management Process

The full Asbestos Management Process provides a framework for dealing with asbestos from project scoping through to completion. Boards can also use the Asbestos Management Process as a guide when dealing with asbestos or ACMs found before or during board-run property projects.

Annual Reports

$
0
0

Annual Report 2016

The Annual Report 2016 was presented to the House of Representatives in accordance with section 44(1) of the Public Finance Act 1989 on 20 October 2016.

A PDF version of the full report is available below. Part One of the Annual Report is also available in HTML. Since being tabled, the Statement of Cash Flows has been amended for a minor editorial error.

A limited number of print copies are available from enquiries@education.govt.nz .

In addition, the Vote Education Section 19B Report in Relation to Non-Departmental Appropriations for the year ended 30 June 2016 was presented to the House in accordance with section 19B of the Public Finance Act 1989 on 20 October 2016.

Applying to the Teacher-led Innovation Fund (TLIF)

$
0
0

Schools and kura – Schools and Kura proposals for Round 3 are now closed.– how to apply

All primary and secondary teachers in state and integrated schools and kura are eligible to apply. Teachers working within and across Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako are encouraged to collaboratively develop their TLIF project proposal.

 Before you start your proposal we recommend reading the  Teacher-led Innovation Fund (TLIF) guide . Schools and Kura proposals still need to be submitted by 16 March 2017.

Application process

TLIF Round 3 –  Timeline for schools and kura

25 November 2016Schools and kura applications opened
16 March 2017School and kura applications closedclose
June 2017Letters sent to all applicants
1 July 2017Successful projects start

Early Childhood Education services me ngā Kōhanga Reo – how to apply

All qualified early childhood education services me ngā kōhanga reo (early learning services) teachers can apply. Applying is a 2 step process:

Email us with your expression of interest by 12 noon 16 March 2017*

This will help us get an idea of how many applications we’re going to get. Email Teacherled.innovfund@education.govt.nz with the:

  • Name of proposed lead ECE service or ngā Kōhanga Reo
  • Name of project contact person and contact details

*Proposals submitted without prior expression of interest may not be accepted.

Start preparing your proposal

Once you’ve emailed us your expression of interest you can start preparing your proposal. We suggest you read the TLIF guide for Early Childhood Education Services me ngā Kōhanga Reo first.

Application process

TLIF Timeline for Early Childhood Education Services me ngā Kōhanga Reo

1 February 2017Applications open
16 March 2017Expressions of interest close
13 April 2017Applications close
June 2017Letters sent to all applicants
1 July 2017Successful projects start

Useful information for all applicants for preparing proposals

Information on action plans

  • A strong proposal includes a clear description of what the project would look like in action and shows how the team will address the inquiry questions Our resource will help you prepare your action plan. Go to our  writing an action plan resource [DOCX, 66 KB] for information and exemplars to help you prepare your own action plan.

Project management forms

$
0
0

On this page:

  • School-led Project Form
  • Ministry-led Project Form
  • Asset Update Form
  • Design Fees Release Form
  • Invoice Templates
  • Procurement Forms

School-led Project Form

Who completes it?

The project manager completes the form with input and agreement from the school's board of trustees.

When to complete it

Complete the form at the beginning of any capital building project.

What is in the form?

The form records the project scope, timing and financial information. Your completed application will include copies of the design certificate, occupancy use certificate and construction observation form.

Download the form

Note: TheYou can use the editable PDF or the Excel version of thisthe form has been replaced by this(you will have to use Excel version (21 March 2017).if you don't have Internet Explorer and a Windows PC).

Please save the form before beginning.

Submit the form

Send the completed form to your property adviser so that we:

  • can release funding for projects
  • can track the project’s progress
  • meet legal and accounting requirements for a capital building project
  • can make sure funding goes to the correct project 
  • have the documentation needed for audit purposes
  • can upload the data into our asset management system (Helios).

Ministry-led Project Form

Who completes it?

The Ministry project manager/delivery lead.

When to complete it

Complete the form at the beginning of any capital building project run as a Ministry-led project.

What is in the form?

The form records: the project scope, financial information, procurement, components and allocations and also contains relevant certificates (design, occupancy and construction observation).

Download the form

Asset Update Form

What's it for?

Complete a form for each new, altered or demolished asset as the final record of work completed.

Who completes it?

Project managers.

When to complete it

Complete the Asset Update Form at the beginning of the project and at the end of the project if further changes were made.

Download the form and guide

Submit the form

Save the form and fill it electronically, or print, fill and send to your local Ministry office .

Note: The asset update forms on the PMIS site are no longer available. The Interim Asset Update Form should be used until we release an online version in 2017.

Release dates and training informaton for the online process will be provided early in 2017.

Design Fees Release Form

What’s it for?

Use this form if you need to pay for consultancy services and/or consent fees before completing the construction tender (for projects over $100,000).

Note: Only Type 3: School (Prof PM) projects that are already authorised may have the design fees released.

Who completes it?

Project managers.

When to complete it

Before completing the construction tender, and if the school has not sent a procurement plan (including design and consent costs) to the Ministry, before going to market.

Download the form

Save the form and fill it electronically, or print to fill it in.

Submit the form

Send to your local Ministry office .

Invoice Templates

What’s it for?

Use this template to submit project invoices to the Ministry if the school has not supplied their own project invoices.

Who completes it?

Project managers.

Download the form

Submit the form

Send to your  local Ministry office .

Procurement forms

Download procurement guides and templates from:

Complete the forms during the procurement process to ensure a fair and transparent tendering process.

When the funding forms are submitted they must be accompanied by the signed/approved Procurement Plan and Procurement Recommendation Report.

Property updates

$
0
0

You can also find news and updates in the  Education Infrastructure Service newsletters .

March 2017

Project management - form updated

The School-led Project Form has been revised. Changes include minor wording changes for clarification, repair and protection of the calculation function that produces the school name from the number entered, and the Invoice tabs have been re-ordered.

The editable PDF version of the form has been removed.

Property Portal - new content

You can now access Notional Lease information (as well as Property Maintenance Grant, and School Property Guide data).

Revised construction contracts

The weathertightness warranty in the Major Works and Medium Works contracts is now optional.

Revised procurement templates and guides

SomeThe following revised procurement templates and guides have been revised. You can download them from the procurement templates and guides page, and you can read about the changes below.templates/guides are now available:

  • Procurement templates and guidesContract works procurement plan - full (for open tender)
  • Contract works procurement plan - short (for closed tender/direct source)
  • Contract works Registration of Interest (ROI)
  • Contract works Request for Tenders (RFT)
  • Contract works Request for Quotes (RFQ)
  • Contract works RFQ Lite (optional for under $50k)
  • Contract works Schedule of Prices
  • Contract works price analysis workbook
  • Open tender evaluation workbook
  • Procurement quick guide
  • Conflict of interest and confidentiality agreement
  • Exemption request
  • Recommendation report
  • Successful/short-listed respondent letter
  • Unsuccessful respondent letters

Professional Services specific templates and the remaining templates and guides are currently being revised and will be released shortly.

For enquiries regarding revised procurement templates, please email:  Dean.Hollis@education.govt.nz .

Revised templates and guides
Procurement Plan - Full (Works) (for open tender)
Procurement Plan - Short (Works) (for closed tender/direct source)
Registration of Interest (Works)
Contract Works Request for Tenders (RFT)
Request for Quotes (Works)
Request for Quotes Lite (optional for under $50k)
Price Schedule (Works)
Price Analysis Workbook (Works)
Open Tender Evaluation Workbook
Procurement Quick Guide
Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Agreement
Procurement Exemption Request
Procurement Recommendation Report
Preferred/Short-listed Respondent Letter
Unsuccessful Respondent Letter

 ChangesChanges include:

  • Introduction of the Request for Tenders (RFT) for Contract Works (in addition to the Request for Proposals (RFP) for Professional Services)
  • The RFT and other Contract Works specific templates align with:
    • the latest Ministry Construction Works Contracts
    • the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 
    • Contract Works Price Schedule and Contract Works Price Analysis Workbook
  • Evaluation Criteria weightings for Professional Services RFP have been changed to:
    • Proposed Solution: 10%
    • Capability: 45%
    • Capacity: 5%
    • Price: 40%
  • Evaluation Criteria weightings for Professional Services ROI:
    • Capability: 80%
    • Capacity: 20%
  • Approach to market templates (ROI,RFT,RFP,RFQ) refer to a single, separate RFx Process Terms and Conditions document.
  • Introduction of a Request for Quote Lite (RFQ Lite) that is optional for use for under $50,000 procurements of goods, services or works.
  • Conformance and Best Value evaluation method or evaluating RFQs (direct source and closed tender) requires quotes to be scored ( /10) for proposed solution, capability and capacity as the means for determining which quotes conform/meet the requirement prior to selecting the conforming quote that is adjudged to represent best value.
  • The RFT and other Contract Works-specific templates align with:
    • the latest Ministry Construction Works Contracts
    • Contract Works Price Schedule and Contract Works Price Analysis Workbook
    • the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 (see below)

 

Health and safety requirements in Contract Works RFx templates (ROI, RFT & RFQ) have been updated to reflect the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015.

Professional Services specific templates and the remaining templates and guides are currently being revised and will be released shortly.

Changes include:For enquiries regarding revised procurement templates, please email: dean.hollis@education.govt.nz .

  • The Contractor must:Procurement templates and guides
  • The Contractor must be capable (in relation to health and safety) as evidenced by accreditation to one of the following or by demonstrating that they operate a documented health and safety system of a standard comparable to that required to meet accreditation to one of the following:
    • AS/NZS 4801:2001 (Occupation Health and Safety Management Systems)
    • Accident Compensation Corporation’s Workplace Safety Discount (less than 10 employees)
    • Accident Compensation Corporation’s Workplace Safety Management Practices (more than 10 employees).

For all enquiries relating to Health and Safety for school property projects, contact: 

Eis.healthandsafety@education.govt.nz

 

Toilet reference designs

Version 2.0 of the Toilet Reference Design Guide has been released. The updated version incorporates feedback on the earlier version, and considers the recent coroner's report.

February 2017

Health and Safety Charter

Find out about the commitment the Education Infrastructure Service and their partners have to the health, safety and well-being of our workers and workplaces.

Property Portal

The Property portal is now live. On this site schools can access the Property Maintenance Grant and School Property Guide previously accessed via PMIS.

January 2017

Project management forms

New project management forms have been added - Design Fees Release Form, Invoice Templates, and Ministry-led Project Forms.

PMIS update

Updated information about the Ministry's Property Information System (PMIS), and how to access up-to-date school property data.

December 2016

Project management forms

Project management forms have been replaced, including an Interim Asset Update Form.

Construction contracts

Following feedback after their release in October, we've made some changes to the Construction Works Templates.

Read about the changes, and download the updated templates and guidance:

Health and safety

The Health and safety management page has been reorganised so related topics are grouped together. There is also new information about health and safety for contractors working on property projects.

November 2016

Construction rates

Construction rates have been updated, and the new rates are to be used for projects approved after 1 December 2016

October 2016

New asbestos risk management checklist

A checklist has been added to the asbestos management page to help contractors be sure they are following all the steps for safe asbestos risk management.

Construction contracts

Updated templates and guidelines for construction contracts.

New templates must be used from 17 October 2016.

Designing Quality Learning Spaces - Acoustics

A substantial update on the 2007 guide. It will become mandatory for all projects starting from 1 January 2017.

Read about key changes and download the PDF:

Reference Design - ugrading Nelson two storey blocks to flexible learning spaces

Each reference design package contains a general briefing document for Boards of Trustees, supported with three appendices of technical information, including:

  • an architectural scope and design plans with layout options and enhancements
  • a structural scope including structural calculations, design features report, accessibility report, and fire report; and
  • an estimated cost analysis.

Read more and download all the reference design packages:

Reference Design - Toilets

New information includes:

  • written guidelines
  • example drawing layouts for design teams to use when planning to build new (or upgrade existing) toilet facilities

Read more and download the guide:

 

Contract Works: Templates and guides

$
0
0

Terms and conditions

Before beginning the procurement process, read and understand the terms and conditions.

Templates and guides

 CategoryDocument Non-competitive purchaseDirect Source
One Quote
$10k - <$50k
Closed Tender
Three Quotes
$50k - <$100k
Open Tender
On GETS >$100k
GuidesProcurement Quick Guide
 Direct Source/Closed Tender Guide  
 Guide - School Property Open Tender Process   
 Open Tender Evaluation Guide   
 GETS Procurement Officer Guide   
 Guide - Contract Works Price Analysis   
 Procurement Sponsor Guide 
Procurement plansContract Works Procurement Plan (Short)  
 Contract Works Procurement Plan (Full)   
Approach to market templatesContract Works Request for Quotes Optional 
 Contract Works Registration of Interest   
 Contract Works Request for Tenders   
Other templatesRegistration of Interest Evaluation Workbook    
 Open Tender Evaluation Workbook    
 Procurement Recommendation Report✔ (5YA funded projects only)   
 Preferred/Short-listed Respondent Letters    
 Unsuccessful Respondent Letter    
 Contract Works Schedule of Prices    
 Contract Works Price Analysis Workbook    
 Exemption Request    
 Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Agreement     

Professional services: Templates and guides

$
0
0

Terms and conditions

Before beginning the procurement process, read and understand the terms and conditions.

Templates and guides

 CategoryDocument Non-competitive purchaseDirect Source
One Quote
$10k - <$50k
Closed Tender
Three Quotes
$50k - <$100k
Open Tender
On GETS >$100k
GuidesProcurement Quick Guide
 Direct Source/Closed Tender Guide  
 Guide - School Property Open Tender Process   
 Open Tender Evaluation Guide   
 GETS Procurement Officer Guide   
 Guide - Contract Works Price Analysis   
 Procurement Sponsor Guide 
Procurement plansProfessional Services Procurement Plan (Short)  
 Professional Services Procurement Plan (Full)   
Approach to market templatesProfessional Services Request for Quotes Optional 
 Professional Services Registration of Interest   
Other templatesRegistration of Interest Evaluation Workbook    
 Open Tender Evaluation Workbook    
 Procurement Recommendation Report✔ (5YA funded projects only)   
 Preferred/Short-listed Respondent Letters    
 Unsuccessful Respondent Letter    
 Exemption Request    
 Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Agreement     

Scholarships, awards and funding for people working in schools

$
0
0

 

TeachNZ study awards, sabbatical or support study grants for the 2017 school year

Applications are now open for these awards. Go to the TeachNZ study awards website for more information and to apply. 

Special education scholarships and study awards

These awards are to support and encourage you as you develop your skills in working with students with special education needs. You can apply for these scholarships from 1 August 2017.
Special education scholarships and study awards information for 2017 .

Teaching English in schools for speakers of other languages (TESSOL) scholarships

Scholarships for Teaching English in Schools for Speakers of Other Languages (TESSOL)

We offer tuition fees scholarships for study towards a TESSOL qualification. Scholarship information is posted to schools in October each year and applications need to be received by the end of October in the same year.

Teacher-led Innovation Fund - Round 3 closed now

Round 3 closed onopened in November 2016 for schools and closes 16 March 2017. 

Go to the  Teacher Led Innovation fund page for more information.

Prime Minister's Education Excellence Awards - closed onentries open now closing 17 March 2017

These are annual awards open to any group, team or partnership from a school, Kura or early learning service. Entries need to focus on improving outcomes for children and young people. 
Go to the  Prime Minister's Awards website for more information and to enter.

The Aspire Scholarship

$
0
0

 

What is the scholarship?

The Aspire Scholarship has been designed for students from low income families who would like to attend a New Zealand private secondary school. The scholarship contributes up to $15,000 per year for private secondary school fees and up to $1,500 per year for course related costs.

Eligibility

A student is eligible for a 20182017 Aspire Scholarship if:

  • they will be in year 9 in 20182017
  • their primary caregiver(s) have a joint annual gross income of $56,000 or less (not including Working for Families tax credits)

    their primary caregiver(s) have a joint annual gross income of $56,000 or less (not including Working for Families tax credits)
  • their primary caregiver(s) have a combined net worth of $200,000 or less (not including household items)
  • they, or their primary caregiver(s), are not beneficiaries of any trusts (exceptions will be made on a case by case basis)
  • they are a New Zealand citizen or a permanent resident of New Zealand
  • an application is received in hard copy at the Ministry of Education National Office by 5pm on Friday 1913 May 20172016

What does it cover?

An Aspire Scholarship will contribute up to $15,000 per year for tuition fees, and up to $1,500 per year for course related costs, for years 9-13, the duration of a student’s attendance at their chosen private school. Tuition fees include term fees, enrolment fees, application fees, and any other compulsory attendance fee that is directly related to a student’s tuition. It is the responsibility of the parents/caregivers to pay for any remaining school fees over and above the contribution from the Aspire Fund. Course related costs are any additional school items or costs related to the student’s schooling.

The scholarship does not cover boarding fees. If a student chooses to board at a private boarding school, families may use their $1,500 course related costs allowance towards the costs of boarding, but are otherwise responsible for any boarding costs. The scholarship can only be used at New Zealand’s fully registered private secondary schools (also known as independent schools). It cannot be used at state or state-integrated schools. The New Zealand Private Schools list, included on the application form, has a list of schools that are compatible with the Aspire Scholarship. If a school is not on the list, you can't enrol there with an Aspire Scholarship.

The New Zealand Private Schools list has contact details for schools that are compatible with the Aspire Scholarship. If a school is not on the list, you can't enrol there with an Aspire Scholarship.

Selection process

Applicants will be balloted for the 20182017 Aspire Scholarships, and drawn at random. Only applicants who meet the eligibility criteria will be included in the ballot. Academic achievement and personal qualities are not relevant for this scholarship, and will not affect an applicant’s chance of receiving a scholarship.

All applicants will be advised of the outcome of their application by letter.

Successful scholarship recipients

Successful Aspire Scholarship recipients are fully responsible for enrolling at a private school, and are not guaranteed enrolment at any private school by the Ministry of Education. Private schools have their own enrolment processes and conditions, and recipients must abide by these.

After scholarship recipients are notified by the Ministry, they will be given approximately three monthsfour weeks to confirm an enrolment at a private school. Applicants are encouraged to make contact with private schools before they are notified of the outcome of their application so they are well prepared if their application is successful.

Contact details for each private school can be found on the New Zealand private schools list, included on the application form. Go to the Independent Schools of New Zealand website for information about some private schools.

Ongoing support

An Aspire Scholarship holder may keep their scholarship for the time they attend a private school - a maximum of 5 years (Year 9 to Year 13). The duration may be extended in exceptional circumstances. Support will be stopped if the student leaves school or transfers to a state or state-integrated school. If the student transitions directly to another Aspire compatible private school, they will be able to keep their Aspire Scholarship if the family takes responsibility for any additional fees involved in the transition.

Apply now

Applications for 2018 Aspire Scholarships are now open and close on 19 May 2017. Use the online form to apply today . You may find the application form guidelines helpful when completing this. Successful applicants will be notified by letter.

If you have any questions, read the supporting information about the programme and answers to frequently asked questions, orfurther enquiries, please get in touch:

ECAC minutes and presentations December 2016

$
0
0

Attendees

ECAC members

  • Tanya Harvey, Early Childhood Leadership
  • Clare Wells, New Zealand Kindergartens Inc
  • Karen Affleck, The Federation of Rudolf Steiner Schools
  • Raewyn Overton-Stuart, Home Early Learning Organisation
  • Kathy Wolfe, Te Rito Maioha Early Childhood New Zealand
  • Peter Reynolds, Early Childhood Council
  • Cathy Wilson, Montessori Aotearoa NZ
  • Jo Young, NZEI Te Riu Roa
  • Charmaine Thomson, NZEI Te Riu Roa
  • Thelma Chapman, Christian Early Childhood Education Association of Aotearoa
  • Susan Foster-Cohen, Early Intervention Association Aotearoa New Zealand
  • Susan Bailey, New Zealand Playcentre Federation
  • Marianne Kayes, Hospital Play Specialists Association of Aotearoa New Zealand
  • Hellen Puhipuhi, Pasifika Advisory Group
  • Arapera Royal-Tangaere, Te Kōhanga Reo National Trust
  • Michelle Unuia, Barnardos New Zealand
  • Deborah Wansbrough, Education Council of Aotearoa New Zealand
  • Sandra Collins, Education Review Office

Ministry of Education

  • Katrina Casey, Deputy Secretary, Sector Enablement and Support
  • Nancy Bell, Director, Early Learning
  • <Senior Manager>, Senior Manager, ECE Resourcing and Implementation
  • <Senior Manager>, Senior Manager, ECE Policy
  • <Senior Adviser>, Senior Adviser, ECE Implementation Planning (secretariat)
  • <Senior Adviser>, Senior Adviser, ECE Implementation Planning (secretariat support)

Apologies

  • Penelope Janes, Barnardos New Zealand
  • Evan Kidd, New Zealand Homebased Early Childhood Education Association
  • Kararaina Cribb, Te Kōhanga Reo National Trust
  • Susan Howan, Ministry of Education

Welcome, karakia and introductions

Susan Howan

  • Katrina welcomed the group; Kathy Wolfe opened the meeting with a karakia.
  • Apologies, minutes and actions were previously circulated by email and confirmed.
Action itemsResponsibilityDeadline
No action items.  

Introducing Iona Holsted, Secretary for Education

  • Iona acknowledged ECAC as a unique and important forum that represents the diversity of the early learning sector. She thanked the group for coming together at such a busy time of the year. 
  • We have known for a long time the importance of early learning. Curriculum is important, but first and foremost parents want to know their children are safe and happy.
  • There was a brief discussion around the Ministry’s areas of focus, including the Te Whāriki update, Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako and learning support update.
Action itemsResponsibilityDeadline
No action items.  

Te Whāriki update consultation

Nancy Bell, Ministry of Education

Refer to  presentation slides .

  • Nancy explained that a substantive amount of feedback has been received through the consultation process, either via 36 regional hui (with 1,400 attendees), online (380 responses so far) or individual meetings. Consultation closes on Friday, 16 December 2016.
  • Detailed and thoughtful feedback has been received and Nancy provided an overview of this. It is clear that there is more work to do to articulate the ideas valued by the writers and the sector.
  • Feedback will be analysed in detail by Nancy’s team. All feedback will be coded into themes to ensure that it is included in the analysis. The aim is to ensure that the update meets stakeholder group expectations as well as those of the Minister of Education.
  • Nancy asked ECAC members for their feedback on the most important themes in the feedback. Discussion included the inclusion of NZ Sign and other official languages, the importance of learning dispositions and questions to deepen practice, visibility of pedagogical leadership, and the importance of reflecting the diversity of provision.
  • The group expressed their concern about the ability of the Ministry to complete this work before the roll-out; Nancy responded that the sector’s feedback and suggestions have been very useful and will help the writers to make good progress within the timeframe.
  • A complementary website (Te Hono) will be developed and launched concurrently with Te Whāriki, and Nancy provided an overview of the draft layout of this. 
  • The content of the website will link to exemplars (to be developed) and other assessment frameworks and tools, eg Kei Tua o te Pai. Te Hono will also include resources which are not currently available online such as Te Aho Tuktutuku | Early Mathematics. ECAC members were positive about this. Nancy invited members to get in touch with feedback at anytime.
Action itemsResponsibilityDeadline
No action items.  

Update from ERO

Sandra Collins, Education Review Office

Refer to presentation slides.

Key discussion points:

  • Since Iona Holsted presented to ECAC in June, ERO have published their Strategic Intentions 2016-2020 .
  • ERO’s current evaluation indicators were developed and published as part of He Pou Tātaki, ERO’s approach to reviews in 2013. Sandra explained that these would be updated from 2017, using a similar approach taken with the school indicators. This will include engaging with an academic expert group to critique the current indicators and look at current research and evidence. 
  • ERO have also recently published a retrospective study that synthesises 17 of ERO’s national evaluation reports, Early Learning Curriculum – what’s important and what works . The report shows that there is variability of quality across the sector. The Te Whāriki update writers have had access to this report. 
  • Sandra talked about effective internal evaluation for improvement. A section of a publication for schools has been adapted and developed for the early learning sector and some hard copies are available. Next year, ERO will be undertaking some effective practice case studies in early learning services. 
  • Next year’s national evaluation reports will include oral language in the early years; food, nutrition and physical activity; and newly graduated teachers and their preparedness to teach.
  • ERO will be working with Nancy’s team as Te Whāriki is updated to undertake a series of national evaluations focused on its implementation in early learning services.
Action itemsResponsibilityDeadline
No action items.  

Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako Subgroup report back

Clare Wells (NZ Kindergartens) and Tanya Harvey (AKA)

Refer to papers circulated prior to meeting.

Tanya provided some background :

  • An ECAC Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako subgroup was supported by the Ministry to provide advice on how to support education and care services me ngā kohanga reo (services) engagement in Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako. 
  • A smaller group was formed to develop the advice into a paper, and this was presented to ECAC in September 2016.

Clare explained progress to date and next steps :

  • The paper presented at ECAC in September has been updated following feedback from the group, and split into three shorter papers:
    • A guide to promote engagement– this sets out ideas for how education and care services me ngā kohanga reo can be involved in Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako, including thresholds and the importance of pedagogical leadership.
    • A strategy for engagement– focuses on some of the policy and communications work that needs to occur, and includes ideas about buy-in and leadership.
    • A process timeline sets out what’s happened so far.

Key discussion points:

  • ECAC members acknowledged the work of the subgroup in developing the papers.
  • The papers attempt to cover how to engage education and care services me ngā kohanga reo in the Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako strategic leadership role and how to ensure all services in the Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako are engaged and working together.  The papers therefore aim to ensure that all types of service can participate in a meaningful way, as well as ensure that services can join at a later date.
  • The papers recommend that, in teacher-led services, those involved in leadership roles hold a current practising certificate. NZ Playcentre Federation and Te Kōhanga Reo National Trust have some feedback on how to make the papers meaningful for their whānau.
  • How professional learning and development would be accessed by services in the Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako was discussed (see separate presentation on this).
  • While there is no requirement for Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako to include services, regional teams are strongly encouraging this.
  • The subgroup is proposing a workstream be set up in the Ministry to provide advice and guidance around Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako roles and leadership for services and schools.  The strategy for engagement paper includes detail on recommended steps for achieving this – genuine and authentic commitment, better communication and messaging, refining the ideas, and a case for greater resourcing and easing the path to participation.
  • ECAC members suggested that it would be useful to see a timeline of actions for 2017.
  • The NZCER report Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako: The Emergent Stage explores the involvement of schools in Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako. The report includes an overview of the development and implementation of the Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako policy, schools’ engagement with Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako, the experiences of early Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako and different perspectives on how Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako are progressing.

ECAC endorsed the ECAC Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako subgroup’s papers.  It was agreed that once the papers had been finalised and submitted to the Ministry, they could be shared with ECAC members who could then send them out to their member services.

Action itemsResponsibilityDeadline
Circulate NZCER report to ECAC members. SecretariatASAP
Finalise and submit Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako subgroup papers to the Ministry.Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako subgroup23 December 2016
Circulate final Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako subgroup papers to ECAC members.Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako subgroup23 December 2016
Respond to Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako subgroup papers<Senior Manager>Next ECAC

Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako communications strategy 

<Lead Adviser>, Ministry of Education

Refer to  presentation slides .

  • <Lead Adviser> provided an overview of how the Ministry has communicated about Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako to date. The Investing in Educational Success (IES) initiative was announced in 2014 and the first Community of Schools (CoS) was approved in December that year. In November 2015, the first three early learning services were approved as part of the Geraldine Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako.
  • There are now 95 early learning services spread over 24 Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako, representing 4,609 children (based on enrolments at July 2014).
  • From early 2017, the Ministry will have a lead advisor dedicated to Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako communications and stakeholder relationships. 
  • Future messaging regarding early learning will focus on teacher expertise and pedagogy, as well as transitions.
  • There will be a Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako story published in the first Education Gazette in 2017, which includes an early learning service. 
  • <Lead Adviser> conveyed the importance of members communicating good news stories involving early learning to the new lead advisor, once appointed, so they can be followed up.
  • The Ministry is currently working with an Auckland Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako that are producing a video about their Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako journey to date. Once this is finalised, we will look at the options for utilising it or snippets from it for various audiences/channels.
  • We are also looking at options for video tutorials, eg showing Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako how to compare early learning data with school data. 
  • These and other channels and methods of communicating about Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako are in the early planning stages but will be more visible in 2017.
Action itemsResponsibilityDeadline
No action items.  

Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako PLD update

Melissa O’Carroll, Ministry of Education

  • Melissa provided an overview of the Professional Learning and Development (PLD) framework for Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako.
  • The framework was initially set up for schools and Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako. ECE services me ngā kōhanga reo in Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako have full access to this. 
  • The Ministry is working to align accredited Strengthening Early Learning Opportunities (SELO) providers with this PLD framework. 
  • The Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako PLD comes from the school PLD budget, ie it’s in addition to what’s available via SELO. 
  • PLD is allocated to Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako to support them to meet their achievement challenge, within areas of national priority. Where early learning services are part of a Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako, they are able to access the PLD resource if this fits with that Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako’s achievement challenge and priorities.
  • The accreditation process for facilitators able to deliver centrally-funded PLD for schools, kura and Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako has just been completed, and a list is available on the Ministry’s website
  • As most Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako have not yet been allocated their PLD budget, there is still lots of opportunity for early learning services to engage in the process. 
  • The group discussed the early learning skills of the accredited facilitators - this will improve over time, and ensuring this will be a key piece of work the Ministry undertakes next year.
  • It was noted that Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako decisions are made by Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako, not the Ministry.
Action itemsResponsibilityDeadline

Circulate list of accredited PLD providers.

SecretariatASAP

Funding Review

Damian Edwards, Ministry of Education

  • Damian explained that the paper that went to Cabinet in October reported back on the outcome of the sector engagement and recommendations for next steps. 
  • A substantial programme of work will now be required to translate the high level concepts into workable options.
  • One of the key changes for early learning is a shift from per-place to per-child funding. The Ministry is currently doing some modelling on this. For much of the sector, this won’t mean much change, but there are some distinctive areas where this will have an impact. 
  • The sector will continue to be engaged in the work via a series of technical reference groups. These will be small, topic-specific, technical groups comprised of sector experts to advise on detailed design. Members will be selected by the Minister, rather than via a nomination process. 
  • The advisory group which was established in the first phase of the review will continue, with a slightly different terms of reference. This group includes three members of ECAC, and is chaired by the Minister of Education.
  • Damian explained that the Ministry will need to test some ideas and assumptions with ECAC. This could be done via the usual agenda at the regular quarterly meeting, or might need to be an additional specific session.
  • More information including the Cabinet Paper can be found on the Ministry’s website .
Action itemsResponsibilityDeadline

Confirm dates for engagement on detail with ECAC.

 SecretariatMarch 2017

Investing in Children Programme

Grant Bennett, Investing in Children Programme

Refer to presentation slides .

  • Grant provided an overview of the Investing in Children Programme. 
  • The programme is developing the strategies, framework, mechanics, policies and procedures required for the operating model of the new Ministry for Vulnerable Children, Oranga Tamariki.
  • This is a long-term process of change, over a 4-5 year horizon.
  • The new Ministry for Vulnerable Children, Oranga Tamariki, will be established from 1 April 2017.
  • There are 6 key building blocks for the future system – engaging all New Zealanders, a child-centred system, strategic partnering, an investment approach (with a well-being frame), high aspirations for Māori, and a trauma-informed professional practice framework.
  • There is a 4-year work programme for the service and practice model design.  Grant offered to provide more detail to ECAC members on these if needed.  The activity in year one focuses on:
    • A blueprint for five core services, investment and impact analysis, and implementation plan,
    • A blueprint for system and agency practice frameworks, and review of assessment and decision making (including Family Group Conferences),
    • The delivery of early enhancement initiatives for children and caregivers, and
    • A detailed service, practice and operating model design for the implementation of new care and protection age settings.
  • Grant explained that they are committed to a co-design approach, and this includes working with the early learning sector.  Regional service design hubs will be run so that communities can be involved in the design process; the plan is for these to get started early in 2017.
  • The legislative changes required to support the transformational changes are significant and will occur in two stages:
  • Grant encouraged ECAC members to contact him if they wanted to continue the discussion with him.
Action itemsResponsibilityDeadline

No action items.

  

Food Act implementation

<Manager>, Ministry for Primary Industries

Refer to presentation slides .

  • <Manager> provided an overview of the early learning sector’s requirements under the Food Act 2014 .
  • All early learning services must ensure the food they serve is safe and suitable.  Some services also have additional requirements under the Act, mostly under National Programme 2.
  • The new legislation is concerned with risks, capabilities and behaviours, and applies to early learning centres that provide food for sale or as part of a paid service.
  • Home-based services are exempt from the Act.  Some activities are also outside the scope of the Act, eg food brought in lunchboxes.
  • Registration and verification should not be complex or onerous. 
  • New centres must register and meet the requirements as soon as they open.  Existing centres must apply for registration by 31 March 2017 and be registered by 30 June 2017; they must be verified within a year of registration.
  • In most cases, registration is done with local councils.  Businesses with sites in multiple areas can register with MPI.
  • ECAC members thought that councils were not ready to receive registrations, but <Manager> explained that they are all ready now. 
  • Verification services are can be provided by specialist companies, as well as local councils.  Not all councils are currently ready yet, and urgent work is underway by MPI to ensure more councils are able to verify early learning centres.
  • Some ECAC members have suggested that a centralised registration system would be useful for the early learning sector.  <Manager> said his team is willing to investigate this possibility with interested ECAC members.
  • <Manager> is keen to hear from ECAC members or services who are experiencing difficulties with registration or verification, or are receiving unreasonable quotes for verification (ie in excess of $500).  His team can be contacted on info@mpi.govt.nz or 0800 00 83 33.

There is more information on the Food Act requirements for the early learning sector on the Ministry’s website .

Action itemsResponsibilityDeadline
No action items.  

Early childhood education me ngā kōhanga reo data summary report 2015

<Manager> and <Senior Analys>, Ministry of Education

Refer to presentation slides .

  • <Manager> and <Senior Analyst> presented highlights from the Early childhood education me ngā kōhanga reo data summary report 2015, which will shortly be published on Education Counts.
  • The report provides a statistical summary of key aspects of the early learning sector and trends over the previous ten years. It uses data from a range of sources, including the 2015 annual census of early learning services.
  • Expenditure information has been included for the first time (though most of this is otherwise publicly available).
  • Most key indicators showed relatively little change between 2014 and 2015. <Manager> explained that the collection methodology has changed – this provides a richer picture, but readers should exercise caution when comparing years.
  • There have been some data quality issues, particularly with regards to staffing data. The Ministry has looked at ways to clean the data, but as the quality of the data for some measures cannot be relied on it has not been included in the report. The Ministry may need to approach ECAC for help on ensuring that services provide accurate data in future Census returns.
Action itemsResponsibilityDeadline
No action items.  

Other discussion items

OECD International Early Learning Study

  • Some ECAC members asked for an update on this project, and expressed concern that work was progressing with Ministry involvement with no input from the early learning sector. 
  • Some members raised concerns that some academics, both globally and nationally, have reservations about the study.
  • <Senior Manager> explained that an international consortium has been contracted by the OECD. The consortium has begun working on what assessment tools might look like for each of four domains – early literacy/oral language; early maths and numeracy; social and emotional skills; and executive function. The study is limited to 3-6 countries only, and a number of countries have already decided not to participate.
  • No decisions have been made regarding whether New Zealand will participate in the study. The deadline for confirming participation is the first half of 2017. The study is scheduled to take place during 2019.

Teacher-led Innovation Fund

  • Applications for the third round of this fund are open for teachers in state and state integrated schools now, due on 16 March 2017. Information is available on the Ministry’s website .
Action itemsResponsibilityDeadline

Provide an update on the OECD International Early Learning Study at the March 2017 meeting.

SecretariatMarch 2017 

Meeting closed 2.45pm

Early Childhood Advisory Committee (ECAC)

$
0
0

The committee is made up of representatives from early childhood education (ECE) sector organisations. It broadly represents licensed ECE services and kōhanga reo. 

Membership of the committee

The Ministry of Education invites ECE organisations to become members of the committee. The organisations then nominate a representative.

The organisations represented on the committee are:

  • Barnardos New Zealand
  • Christian Early Childhood Education Association of Aotearoa
  • Early Intervention Association of Aotearoa New Zealand
  • Early Childhood Council
  • Early Childhood Leadership
  • Home Early Learning Organisation
  • Hospital Play Specialists Association
  • Montessori Aotearoa New Zealand
  • NZEI Te Riu Roa
  • New Zealand Home-based Early Childhood Education Association
  • New Zealand Kindergartens Inc.
  • Playcentre Federation of New Zealand
  • Pasifika Advisory Group
  • Te Kōhanga Reo National Trust
  • Te Aho o Te Kura Pounamu - The Correspondence School
  • Te Rito Maioha Early Childhood New Zealand
  • The Federation of Rudolf Steiner Waldorf Schools in New Zealand.

Meetings

ECAC meets 4 times a year at the Ministry of Education offices in Wellington. As well as the committee, the meetings are attended by Ministry of Education staff and observers from other education agencies.

The meetings allow ECE organisations to:

  • share information
  • give feedback on proposals by the Government, the Ministry and other government agencies 
  • talk about difficulties and opportunities facing the ECE sector
  • identify and discuss strategic challenges and opportunities.

Information from ECAC meetings

Read the minutes and any presentations from ECAC meetings.

ECAC minutes and presentations – February 2017

ECAC met on 15 February 2017. Agenda items included:

  • Review of funding systems
  • OECD early learning study
  • Education Council’s leadership strategy
  • Communities of Learning | Kāhui Ako

Minutes and presentations from this meeting will be available here soon.

Local council requirements for school property projects

$
0
0

Getting council consents for a building project

As project manager, you are responsible for getting any necessary consents and certificates for the school property project you are managing. Local council requirements may include:

  • building consent
  • resource consent or outline plan
  • a certificate for public use
  • a code compliance certificate
  • approval to build over 2 sections.

Even if you think the project won’t require consents, always check with the council. The council won’t accept ignorance as an excuse if building work is carried out without the necessary consents.

Building consent

Building consent is formal approval to do building work. Most school property projects need to have building consent.

After the board has approved the project designs , apply to the local council for building consent. Any processing fees are part of the project budget.

The council considers the plans and checks they comply with the Building Code. If it approves the plan, it issues a building consent for the project.

Resource consent and designations

When building work could affect the environment, the project may need resource consent under the Resource Management Act 1991.

Schools usually don’t need resource consents under the district plan because they are on land designated for educational use. However, resource consents from the regional council may be required.

Regional plan resource consents

The regional council includes in its regional plan the rules for what is permitted and what requires resource consent for activities including:

  • discharging of contaminants or water into water
  • discharging of a contaminant onto or into land that may enter water
  • discharges into the air which could impact air quality.

Designations under the district plan

Under the Resource Management Act 1991, the Minister of Education can serve a Notice of Requirement to designate land for an educational purpose. This protects the land for future development. Once designated, it acts like a form of ‘spot zoning’ over a site in a district plan and the zone rules of the district plan do not apply to the designated site.

In the case of schools, the designation authorises a board to undertake a property project on a school site without getting resource consent, as long as the work is within the scope of ‘education purpose’.

For more information on resource consents, see An Everyday Guide to the RMA (Ministry for the Environment website).An Everyday Guide to the RMA (Ministry for the Environment website) .

Outline plan of works

The Minister is required to advise the local council of any works to be done under the designation. This process is called an ‘outline plan of works’. It ensures that the council is aware of the planned works and can make recommendations to the Minister about those works.

After you have prepared an outline plan of works, send it to the local Ministry office for review and approval. We will then forward it to the council on the school’s behalf.

Resource Management Act charges

Schools are not liable for ‘financial contributions’ under the Resource Management Act. If the school is invoiced for these charges, inform the council that it is unlawful for councils to charge schools for financial contributions. Contact the Ministry if you need help with the council.

Certificate for public use

You will need to apply for a certificate for public use if the school wants to continue to use part of a building while construction work is underway on another part of it, for example, if a large block is under construction and part of the finished building can be used safely.

If the school needs a certificate for public use, apply for it when you apply for building consent. The council will check that the building can be used safely before it provides the certificate.

Building over 2 sections or subdivisions

If the project involves a building that will sit over 2 or more sections or subdivisions, the project will need a certificate under section 75 of the Building Act 2004 (New Zealand Legislation website) . You must do this even if the land is on the same certificate of title.

Talk to the school’s property advisor in the Ministry to get our approval to the section 75 certificate.

Each council has its own process for this. If the council charges a fee, it will be a project cost.

Board’s authority to manage land

Boards of trustees do not own their school’s land but have legal authority to manage it. If the local council questions whether the board can sign application forms during the consent process, contact the local Ministry office. To show that the board has authority, we can supply the board with a letter and/or:

  • a gazette notice issued under section 70 of the Education Act 1989
  • a certificate of title

which you can attach to the application.

Developing a traffic impact assessment for a new building project

When you apply for building consent for the project, the local council may ask for a traffic impact assessment.

A council’s traffic requirements vary depending on its district plan. It may have either:

  • traffic requirements specific to the type of school, like primary, secondary or tertiary, or
  • more general requirements.

A traffic assessment aims to find out:

  • if the project will increase traffic and demand for parking
  • how the school intends to manage any such changes.

We advise boards about developing a travel plan , which can be used to support a traffic impact assessment.

Using a professional traffic assessment consultant

For a large project, the council may require the board to get a professionally prepared traffic impact assessment with an engineer’s report. You can ask the council if they have names of companies who carry out these assessments.

If you provide the school’s travel plan to the council’s traffic engineer, it may reduce the time and cost of the consultant.

Completing a cultural impact assessment

As part of a resource consent application, the council may require a cultural impact assessment (CIA) for the project. It may even ask for one if the project doesn’t need resource consent. See sections 6, 7 and 8 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (New Zealand Legislation website) .

Projects that might impact on mana whenua cultural values

The purpose of a CIA is not to seek iwi approval for a project but to seek expert advice on how the project might affect mana whenua cultural values, interests and associations, or a natural resource within an area of interest to Māori.

Mana whenua means the territorial rights, power from the land, authority over land or territory associated with possession and occupation of tribal land held by iwi (the people). These iwi gain mana whenua through a hapū or ancestor who holds the customary rights over a specific area, land or watercourse, including natural resources.

Project that might need a CIA include those involving:

  • discharges to air, land or water
  • diverting, taking, using or damming water
  • reclaiming or disturbing a river bed or the coastal marine area
  • removing mangroves
  • disturbing land or clearing vegetation in a significant ecological area
  • work that is close to sites or places of significance or value to the local iwi – this could include any property work, like new building construction and demolitions.

The council’s district plan will state:

  • when a project might impact on sites and places of significance or value to mana whenua
  • when the project needs a CIA.

Even if a council requires a CIA, iwi authorities may decide it is not needed.

If more than one iwi has rights to an area for historical reasons and/or following a treaty settlement, you may need to get more than one CIA. Some iwi work together for CIA purposes.

Outcome of a CIA

If the CIA finds that your project will affect cultural values, you and the board will need to discuss it with iwi to work out how to reduce the project’s impact. If you cannot reach an agreement, the Ministry can make the final decision. We take into account the iwi’s concerns but are not bound by them because school sites are held under a designation .

The council also takes the CIA into account, but it is the council that makes the decision about your resource consent application.

Cultural impact assessment process

The following 8 steps take you through the CIA process. As project manager, you should manage this process but ensure someone from the board is involved in the consultation with iwi.

Step one: Establish whether you need a CIA

Before starting a property project, talk to the local council about whether the work requires resource consent and a CIA.

Requirements differ depending on which region the school is in.

The Auckland Council requires schools in its region to get a CIA in certain circumstances. If the school is outside of the Auckland region, check with the council to see if it requires a CIA.

In the Auckland region: If you require a CIA, you can use the Auckland Council’s facilitation service, which simplifies the CIA process. It contacts iwi on your behalf.

Rather than taking the next steps on this page, you can follow the steps in the Cultural Impact Assessments Process factsheet (PDF, 99KB) (Auckland Council website) .

To investigate for yourself, go to the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (Auckland Council website) for:

  • Auckland Unitary Plan Schedule 4.1: Sites and Places of Significance – Overlay (shows 50m buffer)
  • Auckland Unitary Plan Schedule 4.2: Sites and Places of Value – Overlay (shows 50m buffer).

Also go to resource management applications and assessments in the Auckland region (Auckland Council website) .

Outside the Auckland region: Councils outside the Auckland region differ in their CIA requirements. Some may advise if you need a CIA, or you may need to investigate whether the project is in a site or place of significance or value.

If the project requires a CIA, go to step 2.

If the project does not require a CIA, you need not go any further with this process. However, it is possible that the site may become a site or place of significance or value if the council changes its unitary or district plan. So it is a good idea to check with local iwi about what values they hold relating to the site. This is especially important if the project involves:

  • earth works
  • works in a stream
  • native tree management (for example, pōhutukawa)
  • taking water
  • discharges to water.

Step 2: Contact iwi

Contact the relevant iwi authority. Ask the council for details of the iwi you need to speak with.

Step 3: Establish that the iwi would like the CIA to go ahead

Ask the iwi if they would like the project to have a CIA.

  • If no, make a written record of your communication on mana whenua cultural values and include this record in your resource consent application.
  • If yes, go to step 4.

Step 4: Give iwi the information it needs

Ask the iwi what information it needs from you. It is likely it will want:

  • a copy of the application
  • supporting documents
  • contact details of a person they can discuss any questions with
  • information on your expectations, such as when you would like the CIA, project scope and content, roles and responsibilities, and costs.

Iwi may differ in the way they would like to be consulted. Generally you will meet with iwi representatives, who may be:

  • specific resource management staff (kaitiaki) who are authorised to make decisions on behalf of the iwi
  • representatives who need to get agreement from others in their iwi or hapū.

Step 5: Iwi prepares the CIA

An iwi representative prepares the CIA. They should have a clear mandate from the relevant iwi authority to prepare CIAs.

We recommend that you meet with the iwi to discuss the CIA before it is finalised. Then you can discuss the recommendations in the CIA for managing impacts of the project, such as site blessings or cultural monitoring.

Step 6: Iwi sends the CIA and invoice

The iwi authority sends you the final CIA and a tax invoice for its services. The CIA preparation costs are a cost to the project.

Step 7: Send the CIA with the resource consent application

Include the CIA in your application for resource consent when you send it to the council.

Step 8: Keep the iwi informed

Keep the iwi informed throughout the resource consent process. Usually a larger project requires more extensive communication.

The council will find your CIA findings useful as it develops its knowledge base for identifying, researching and assessing sites that are not yet on its schedule of sites and places of significance and value to mana whenua.

Council development contributions

Where a school project is associated with a new subdivision, the council may ask the school for a development contribution in the form of money or land.

However, schools are exempt from development contributions because the empowering provision is not binding on the Crown - see section 8(1) of the Local Government Act 2002 .

If the council invoices the school for ‘development contributions’, this is unlawful and these costs do not need to be paid.

Getting a code compliance certificate

All projects needing building consent will also need a code compliance certificate when the project is completed. Apply to the council for:

  • a final inspection
  • the certificate once the council is satisfied the work complies with the building consent.

The board of trustees cannot use the building until it has the code compliance certificate. Make sure the board understands it could be fined up to $200,000 a day for each day people use the building without a code compliance certificate.

One exception where you do not have a code compliance certificate

The only exception is if the project already has a certificate for public use to use the finished part of the building.

Behaviour services to help schools and students

$
0
0

Behaviour Services and Support (was Severe behaviour services)

Call Behaviour Services and Support , a team of specialists, if a student is experiencing extreme behaviour difficulties. A specialist will work with the student, teachers, family and whānau. For Yearsyears 1 to 10.

Behaviour Crisis Response

If extreme behaviour causes a crisis at your school, contact your district office for immediate help from your local Behaviour Crisis Response Service.

Contact your district office for your local Behaviour Crisis Response Service

Read more about the Behaviour Crisis Response Service .

You can also contact your local Traumatic incident team . They work with incidents involving people, and also natural disasters.  They can help you prepare an emergency plan. 

Interim Response Fund

Apply for the interim response fund short-term funding to help your school when extreme behaviour reaches crisis point. Pay for short-term resources, meet student needs, and get learning back on track.

Intensive Wraparound Service (IWS)

The Intensive Wraparound Service (IWS) is for the few students who have especially complex and severe behavioural problems, which may include intellectual difficulties. For years 3 to 10.

Positive Behaviour for Learning – PB4L

Positive Behaviour for Learning covers 10 services that improve well-being and behaviour of children and students, and relationships in schools. Services are for children and students, schools, and family and whānau.

Support for schools to minimise physical restraint

New guidance for schools managing challenging student behaviour includes strategies for preventative and de-escalation techniques and information on a new training workshops for schools.


Support for schools to minimise physical restraint

$
0
0

New guidance is now available for schools managing challenging student behaviour. This sits alongside existing resources, helping schools to minimise the use of physical restraint and exclude the use of seclusion. Download the new resource.

The new resource includes strategies for preventative and de-escalation techniques. Time Out, for example, is still an acceptable method of de-escalation, whereas seclusion is not.

Seclusion is when all 3 of the following things happen at the same time.

  • a child is placed involuntarily in the room
  • they are alone
  • they cannot freely leave the room

This new guidance also highlights the use of physical restraint as a last resort - where there is imminent danger of physical injuryto the student, other students or staff.

Training workshop for behaviour management Understanding Behaviour, Responding Safely

In addition, a new training workshop for schools concerned with behaviour management is underway.

The workshop is in modules, for whole school staff groups focusing on prevention and de-escalation strategies. It’s delivered by professionals who are experienced in behaviour management and will also provide on-going support.

The new resource and the training modules were developed through extensive consultation with sector representatives, incorporating their feedback and advice.

 

 

 

Refugee background students

$
0
0

New Zealand accepts approximately 750 refugees annually through the United Nations’ quota programme. Quota refugees spend about 6 weeks at the Centre for Refugee Education at the Refugee Resettlement Centre at Mangere.

Refugees can also apply to sponsor family members to join them in New Zealand under the family reunification programme. The family members do not go through the Refugee Resettlement Centre.

There are also asylum seekers whose claim for refugee status is determined by Immigration New Zealand.

Find out where some of New Zealand’s recent refugee groups have come from.

ESOL funding

English language learners from a refugee background qualify for ESOL funding in the same way as other English language learners. Refugees receive more intensive funding support for the first 2 years at school here, followed by 3 years of standard funding.

Check the ESOL funding criteria and amounts .

Apply for ESOL funding for a refugee background student.

Supporting students from a refugee background

Some children from a refugee background may have been in camps for most of their lives. They may have no memory of ordinary life and little knowledge about their own country. They may have fallen years behind in education or have never had any formal education.

For some, the trauma of moving to a new country and learning a new language can be greater than previous traumas of war and refugee camps.

The Ministry of Education’s Refugee Handbook for Schools has detailed information to help schools support students from a refugee background – to help them learn and feel part of the school community and New Zealand society. If you have difficulty accessing the document, please email  info.esol@education.govt.nz .

The handbook includes sections on:

  • welcoming students
  • enrolment, placement and monitoring
  • planning and delivering effective teaching programmes
  • using bilingual support workers
  • providing pastoral care
  • supporting students at transition points.

Senior Advisers for Refugee and Migrant Support are based in Ministry of Education regional offices in Christchurch, Wellington, Hamilton and Auckland. The senior adviserscoordinators liaise between refugee communities, agencies and schools to help with education and resettlement. They can also help your school work with Special Education Services to support students with high and complex needs.

The Ministry has also established a Refugee Flexible Funding Pool which offers schools additional resources to address broader issues that may prevent refugee background students from participating and achieving in mainstream schooling. Please contact your nearest Senior Adviser refugee and migrant supporteducation coordinator for more information about this funding.

Seclusion in schools

$
0
0

Schools secluding students have been asked to stop the practice immediately and to report any previous use of seclusion to their board of trustees and Director of Education their region. The Ministry is supporting schools which have used seclusion in the past to explore other options so that the use of seclusion ceases with immediate effect.

Schools should also contact the Ministry of Education for advice and support if a situation requires the use of physical restraint. restraint.

Time out is still an acceptable way to manage student behaviour.

Survey of schools who reported they used seclusion practices in 2016

The Ministry of Education recently completed a survey on the use of seclusion in New Zealand schools. The below Education Report outlines the process undertaken to compile the list of schools and details the findings.

Following the completion of this survey, the Ministry has worked intensively with a very small proportion of schools to change their practice. A total of 17 out of 2529 schools reported using seclusion in 2016 – all have now stopped.

Guidance for New Zealand Schools on Behaviour Management to Minimise Physical Restraint

This guidance will help schools use positive strategies for managing student behaviour. It focuses on preventative and de-escalation techniques with the priority on the wellbeing and safety of both staff and students. It has been developed by a cross-sector advisory group.

Training

Understanding Behaviour – Responding Safely is a training package for schools focussing on preventative and de-escalation techniques. It includes a full-day workshop for all staff and ongoing support afterwards. The training can be delivered in modules rather than a full day if this is a better option for your school. Contact your regional Director of Education for further details

Student behaviour - help and guidance

$
0
0

 

Behaviour services to help schools

Services to support teachers and parents to manage children and students with extreme behaviour needs.

Services to help manage behaviour

Accessing the Interim Response Fund (IRF)

The  Interim Response Fund is a fund is to keep students engaged in learning following a significantly challenging behavioural event.

Searching and confiscating student property

Guidelines to assist you to develop an appropriate and practical approach to searching students and confiscating their property.

Surrender and retention of property and searches

Standdowns, suspensions, exclusions and expulsions

Guidelines describing the processes for standdowns, suspensions, exclusions and expulsions and help you to act fairly and legally.

Gang insignia on school property - how to prevent this

Information about the 2013 legislation prohibiting gang insignia on school property, the gang insignia that are covered by this legislation and what your school can do to try to prevent this happening.

Prohibiting gang insignia on school property

Help returning young people to education from the Justice system

Education assessments aiming to return child and youth offenders to school.

Seclusion in schools

Seclusion is not acceptable practice in New Zealand schools. 

Seclusion is not acceptable practice in New Zealand schools. Use our Guidance for schools to find positive ways to manage student behaviour.


 

 

Scholarships and competitions

$
0
0

The Aspire Scholarship - closed 13 May 2016

The Aspire Scholarship isis for students from low income families who would like to attend a New Zealand private secondary school. The scholarship contributes up to $15,000 per year for private secondary school fees and up to $1,500 per year for course related costs.

Applications are openclosed for scholarships for 2018 (closing on 19 May 2017).2017.

The Challenge 2016 - closed 8 July 2016

Entries for The Challenge - a multimedia competition open to Year 7-13 students of Māori descent - closed 8 July 2016.

TeachNZ school leaver and undergraduate scholarships

These scholarships usually focus on schools leavers or undergraduates wanting to teach in te reo Māori. Go to the TeachNZ school leaver and undergraduate page for more information.

 

Viewing all 1440 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>